Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edkins, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Forget Trauma? Responses to September 11

Jenny Edkins

University of Wales, Aberystwyth

Traumatic events demand a response that recognizes their impact rather than one that moves rapidly to forgetting the trauma or incorporating it into existing narratives. This article explores four reactions to the events of September 11: securitization, criminalization, aestheticization and politicization. Securitization represents the rapid reinstatement of state power and sovereign control in the face of a traumatic challenge to the state's monopolization of the instrumentalization of human life. While criminalization is less dangerous, it nevertheless involves the depoliticization of opposition and risks outlawing citizen dissent. Aestheticization can be a party to the rebuilding of narratives of nation and heroism in support of state action, but it can also provide a site for critical engagement with the reality of trauma and an acknowledgement of the impossibility of its domestication. Politicization demands a refusal of the easy categories and accepted agendas of what we call `politics' and calls for an engagement with the complexity of the events themselves in all their specificity.

Key Words: security • September 11 • state sovereignty • terrorism • trauma

International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 2, 243-256 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0047117802016002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Security DialogueHome page
L. Jarvis
The Spaces and Faces of Critical Terrorism Studies
Security Dialogue, February 1, 2009; 40(1): 5 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
E. Hutchison and R. Bleiker
Emotional Reconciliation: Reconstituting Identity and Community after Trauma
European Journal of Social Theory, August 1, 2008; 11(3): 385 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
D. Nabers
Culture and Collective Action: Japan, Germany and the United States after 11 September 2001
Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 2006; 41(3): 305 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]