This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heng, Y.-K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The ‘Transformation of War’ Debate: Through the Looking Glass of Ulrich Beck’s World Risk Society

Trinity College, University of Dublin, Ireland

This article adopts an interdisciplinary approach to the ongoing ‘transformation of war’ debate in an age of globalisation. It suggests that careful scrutiny of recent Anglo-American campaigns, from Kosovo to Iraq, reveals a shared underlying concern: the management of globalised systemic risks. This implies an interesting continuity where one might expect discontinuity, given the different US administrations and strategic contexts involved. Policymakers, for instance, have consistently prioritised anticipatory proactive stances to avert probabilistic scenarios. Underpinning the analysis presented here is what sociologist Ulrich Beck terms the ‘world risk society’. Social sciences, notably sociology, have fruitfully incorporated risk theories into their research agendas. International relations, however, has largely not done so in a concerted fashion, despite its cross-disciplinary nature. This article demonstrates that Beck’s ideas in fact have great relevance to understanding the impetus, ethos and outcomes of contemporary war.

Key Words: globalisation • risk management • systemic risks • transformation of war • Ulrich Beck • World Risk Society

International Relations, Vol. 20, No. 1, 69-91 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0047117806060929


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?