Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Relations
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowyer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public Space, Inequality and Health: Interaction and Social Welfare in Rural Peru

Tim Bowyer

University of Wales, Swansea, UK

Social policy initiatives that actively promote greater interaction between the state and civil society are an increasingly important component in the politics of poverty reduction and the promotion of better health for poor people. To address local inequalities, and to strengthen rural economies, local societies and local public services, the government in Peru has introduced a new public space that is designed to incorporate ordinary people into the planning, implementation, administration, management and supervision of public activities. Instead of facilitating cooperation at the district level, this article shows that the idea of people working together and helping each other is undermined by the dislocation of the new public space from the political, cultural and geographical conditions under which social interaction takes place.

Key Words: health • inequality • local culture • popular participation • public space • social interaction • social capital

International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 4, 475-492 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0047117805058536


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?